ASL Calibration

  • Widgets -> ASL Calibration

The ASL Calibration widget is required to turn the perfusion images from ASL model fitting into physical units (ml/100g/min).

Basic data specification

_images/asl_calib_data.png

To do calibration you specify a data set containing a perfusion image. If you want to calibrate an image containing perfusion variance, the Data type selection must be changed (because the scaling factors must be squared in this case).

Calibration methods

Two calibration methods are provided:

  • Voxelwise calibration, in which an M0 correction factor is determined for each voxel from the calibration image.
  • Reference region calibration, in which a single M0 correction factor is determined for the whole image, by analysing a region of the data containing a single tissue type (typically CSF).

Calibration data

Certain parameters are required regardless of which calibration method you use:

_images/asl_calib_calibdata.png

Voxelwise calibration

_images/asl_calib_voxelwise.png

Voxelwise calibration requires a generic estimate of the T1 and the partition coefficient which will be applied to all voxels.

Reference region calibration

_images/asl_calib_refregion.png

The reference region method requires a Reference ROI which identifies a particular tissue type. This would normally be created by a segmentation tool such as FAST, however you could also use the ROI Builder to identify a region of the calibration image of a known tissue type. CSF is the most common.

The T1, T2 and partition coefficient for this tissue type must be specified. Default values are provided for CSF, WM and GM. In addition the sequence TE and blood T1 estimates are required.

Output

Calibration returns a new data set with the suffix _calib, for example perfusion_calib. In the case of reference region calibration, the calibrated image will simply be a scaled copy of the original perfusion image - as shown if we use the Compare Data widget:

_images/asl_calib_compare_refregion.png

In voxelwise calibration this is not the case although there should still be an approximate linear relationship in the areas of interest - the comparison below is within a brain mask:

_images/asl_calib_compare_voxelwise.png